Chelsea Fontenel vs Maia Sung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 11:07 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Fontenel vs M. Sung

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fontenel 1 - 0 Sung
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chelsea Fontenel winning 2 and Maia Sung winning 0. The last match between Chelsea Fontenel and Maia Sung was at the W35 Heraklion, 13-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Chelsea Fontenel getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fontenel | 1 |
| Sung | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Heraklion(10-13-25)
C. Fontenel vs M. Sung H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 45.97% (57-67) | Career Total W/L | 60.00% (6-4) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Fontenel vs M. Sung Match Preview:
- Second Serve Success: Chelsea Fontenel shows a slight edge in second serve points won with a 39.34% success rate compared to Maia Sung's 37.04%. Can this minor advantage influence the match outcome? Yes, it hints at a potentially stronger service game.
- Return Game Dominance: Maia Sung holds a small advantage in returning second serves, having won 51.39% of these points against Chelsea Fontenel's 49.84%. When it comes to returning first serves, Maia significantly surpasses Chelsea with 41.88% over 34.96%, indicating a robust return strategy.
- Pressure Handling: Chelsea excels under pressure, saving 50.00% of breakpoints. Conversely, Maia lags slightly at 42.67%, suggesting Chelsea may be more resilient in critical match situations.
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Maia Sung boasts a significantly higher win percentage at 66.67%, having played fewer but more successful matches. Chelsea Fontenel's win rate stands at 46.51%, depicting a less consistent but more experienced presence.
- Favored Surfaces: Chelsea's track record is best on hard surfaces with a 48% win rate, while Maia shines on clay, holding a 67% success rate. Which surface does the match venue favor? This could tip the scales.
- Competitive Level: Chelsea mostly competes in higher-stakes Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 48.72% of their matches. Maia, however, has a stronger success rate in Futures/Satellites events at 62.50%, possibly due to different levels of competition.
- Opponent Quality: Chelsea frequently plays against higher-ranked opponents averaging a rank of 389.44, whereas Maia's opponents average a rank of 152.67, implying Chelsea faces tougher competition.
- Decisive Set Performance: If the match extends to a deciding set, Chelseaneeds 55% success compared to Maia Sung's flawless 100% win rate, suggesting Maia has superior determination in tight situations.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match features contrasting strengths: Chelsea Fontenel's proficiency under pressure and slightly superior second serve effectiveness against Maia Sung's outstanding return skills and impressive overall match win rate.
Maia exhibits a robust return game, particularly on first serves and underlines her dominance through a perfect record in deciding sets, showcasing her tenacity and ability to close out matches decisively.
Though Chelsea contends with more highly ranked opponents and has a consistent record on hard surfaces, the combined edge in returning games, overall match success, and decisive set victories heavily favor Maia Sung to win.
Chelsea Fontenel vs Maia Sung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Fontenel vs M. Sung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:49:24 | Average Match Time | 1:49:24 |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve % | 67% (39/58) |
| 67% (24/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (23/39) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 52% (30/58) | Return Points Win % | 37% (21/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Fontenel Recent Matches Played
M. Sung Recent Matches Played

C. Fontenel vs M. Sung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.97% (57/67) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 46.48% (132/152) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.55% (12/10) |
| 49.12% (1317/1364) | Games Win/Loss | 50.46% (110/108) |
| 46.67% (21/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.64% (25/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 47.83% (11/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 181 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 249 | Total Double Faults | 33 |
| 1:22:31 | Average Match Time | 1:33:11 |
| 457.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 220.4 |
| 65% (4104/6302) | 1st Serve % | 71% (371/519) |
| 59% (2436/4104) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (194/371) |
| 44% (968/2197) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (58/148) |
| 45% (335/747) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (35/72) |
| 44% (2807/6342) | Return Points Win % | 48% (256/535) |
| 45.63% (47/56) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 47.62% (10/11) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 46% (56/121) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 65% (13/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (20/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 84% (55/46) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 15% (55/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (4/0) |
| 14% (69/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (6/2) |